Reprinted with permission from the October 2009 issue of Public Management (PM)
magazine published by ICMA, the premier local government leadership and management
organization, located in Washington, D.C.
No city manager should take an active part in politics. That clear, succinct statement
of the profession's bedrock principle of political neutrality was expressed in the first
ICMA Code of Ethics. As the profession evolved to include city and county managers,
assistants, and professionals at all levels, the statement of the principle changed as well.
Today, Tenet 7 of the Code, approved by the membership in 1998, requires all those who
work in local government to "Refrain from all political activities which undermine
public confidence in professional administrators. Refrain from participation in the
election of the members of the employing legislative body.
Staying clear of all political activity other than voting for the candidate of your
choice is really a statement of respect and support for our democracy. It's an
acknowledgement of the unique rights and contributions of the voters to select the
political leadership to govern and, in turn, appoint the professionals to manage. For
insight into how political activity can undermine the public's confidence in our work,
consider these two real-world scenarios:
Scenario no. 1: The public information officer has a true passion for public service
that extends beyond his work for the county. The announcement that the district's state
legislator plans to retire at the expiration of her term has the PIO contemplating a
run for the position.
He could be a strong contender given his extensive network of contacts in a wide-open
field. Because success is not a certainty, though, his strategy is to retain his
position with the county while spending his off hours quietly building a base of
support among party leaders, meeting with constituent groups, and raising funds.
When the actual campaign starts, he may take a leave of absence. He doesn't think
that running for elected office would have any negative impact on the county. After
all, he isn't the county manager and doesn't aspire to the position.
Advice: As one who deals with the media and the public, the PIO is naive to believe
that his stealth campaign will remain a secret for long. Once disclosed, his role as
the voice of the organization delivering the policy positions of the elected officials
and news of staff efforts is compromised.
In this era of policy and funding disputes between levels of government, will it be
crystal clear to the public that he presents the views of the county in such matters
and not his own? Will his political activity tarnish the reputation of staff who
strive to be professional and nonpartisan? What's his relationship now with members
of the governing body who may choose to support other candidates for this seat?
With each media appearance, will anyone wonder whether it is driven by county news
or just a desire to raise his visibility with voters? It's a big sacrifice to walk
away from a job to seek another, but in the interest of serving the public the PIO
should resign his position before conducting any campaign activities.
Scenario no. 2: Council adjourned into executive session with the city manager and
city attorney to discuss personnel issues. The mayor thanked the manager for her
efforts but informed her that the council wanted to "go in another direction." The
manager was caught off guard because the council was so new they hadn't even had
time yet to talk about her performance. The mayor asked for her resignation, noting
that if she declined to offer it, she would be terminated. The manager recovered
enough to inform the council that this approach violated the city charter, which
required council to present her with a list of deficiencies and then hold a public
hearing for her reply.
In response, the mayor simply reiterated his request. Word of the council's action
leaked out. Within a day the manager was deluged with calls from business and
community leaders offering support and promising to use their clout to bring an end
to this crazy idea. The manager confirmed the rumors but did nothing more than thank
callers for their support.
As she considered her next steps, the manager decided not to resign because the
council's approach clearly violated the city charter. She expressed that opinion in
a letter to council with a copy to the city attorney. Refusing to be a party to an
illegal act, the manager did not resign and was terminated by the council before a
packed audience filled with the manager's supporters and the media.
An effort to recall the mayor and council was launched, and the now former manager
was asked to support the effort. The manager is tempted to join the effort because
elected officials who violate the law and act in such a reckless manner should be
removed from office. Should she support the recall effort?
Advice: No! As difficult as it is to be terminated without cause or in an unfair
manner, this member must respect the council's right to decide who should serve as
the manager. The manager was right to point out to officials the deficiencies in the
process, but now that the decision has been made, she should exit gracefully with her
integrity intact. Leave the decision of whether the council acted in the public's best
interest up to the public.
Building trust with the public we serve requires a commitment to a higher standard
even at the sacrifice of some of our fundamental rights to participate in our democracy.
Have you encountered an interesting challenge while negotiating compensation or
benefits or collecting them? Please feel free to share your experience with ICMA
by sending me an email at email@example.com. All stories or
comments will be considered confidential unless otherwise noted.